Why are people REALLY getting cancer so much?

Image

There’s a weird article in the NYT this week by George Johnson called “Why Everyone Seems to Have Cancer.” He proposes that, thanks to innovations in the treatment of other diseases, particularly heart disease, people are living longer than ever. Cancer, he suggests, goes hand in hand with old age: since people are outliving heart disease and other illnesses that used to be deadly, more of them will grow old and get cancer.

I don’t buy it. The theory that old age equates with more cancer isn’t compatible with BRCA-related cancers. BRCA+ women who were born after 1960 have much higher rates of cancer than their BRCA+ positive ancestors. In fact, HBOC is being detected on average 10 years earlier in baby boomers and their daughters than in previous generations. In other words, women from the same families, who carry the same genetic mutations, are getting cancer more often at younger and younger ages. That means that these higher rates of cancer cannot simply be the result of people living longer.

What’s changed between 1910 and 1960 to cause younger BRCA+ women to have higher rates of cancer than their grandmothers did? Widespread corporate pollution. The ubiquity of parabens and plastics. Pesticides on vegetables and lawns. Carbon emissions. Hormones pumped into dairy and meat. Increasing use of toxic chemicals in food production and household products. The Breast Cancer Fund has a long list of environmental carcinogens that women encounter regularly, yet Johnson obtusely overlooks the well-documented role played by environmental factors in causing cancer.

Johnson implies that high cancer rates are the byproduct of affluence: you’re going to die somehow, and if you live long enough it’ll probably be from cancer. Indeed, as Breast Cancer Action notes, women in industrialized nations have higher rates of breast cancer than women in unindustrialized nations. But cancer risk within industrialized countries varies considerably by race, class, and region. Racial minorities and the poor have long shouldered the burden of environmental degradation and “environmental racism” surely influences cancer rates. Moreover, women’s reproductive systems are often the first places to register environmental pollution.

Feminists have been advocating for more research into the environmental causes of breast cancer for decades, but such demands have often gone unheeded because they challenge American capitalism. Figuring out what causes breast cancer and taking steps to prevent it would require that corporations stop polluting our food, our communities, and our households. It would require a massive overhaul U.S. law and reformation of enforcement agencies. It would be costly.

Conversely, pinkwashing and mammography are compatible with neoliberalism. The onus shifts to the consumer, who must take on the responsibility for early detection and treatment–all of which is extremely lucrative for the cancer industry (See Gayle Sulik’s Pink Ribbon Blues for more on the cancer industry). In other words, eradicating the environmental factors that contribute to growing rates of cancer is bad for corporations, while treating growing rates of cancer is very very good for their profit margins.

Johnson’s attitude is fatalistic and, worse, utterly depoliticized. He makes cancer seem inevitable, something that we should accept as a consequence of long life expectancies in wealthy countries. I call bullshit. Cancer is not inevitable, even for BRCA+ women (even though it sometimes feels that way). American women need to demand a non-toxic world from politicians and corporations, not blithely accept the bodily consequences of mass pollution and corruption.

Non-industrialized countries have lower breast cancer rates than industrialized countries. – See more at: http://www.bcaction.org/our-take-on-breast-cancer/environment/#sthash.lrHlO731.dpuf
Non-industrialized countries have lower breast cancer rates than industrialized countries. – See more at: http://www.bcaction.org/our-take-on-breast-cancer/environment/#sthash.lrHlO731.dpuf
Advertisements

One thought on “Why are people REALLY getting cancer so much?

  1. My own family – which is affected by BRCA1 – is an example of the way in which the incidence of breast cancer seems to be increasing and coming at earlier ages.

    My grandmother’s generation did not experience any cases of breast cancer, yet we now believe that my grandmother and both her sisters were BRCA1 positive. These three women all had early BRCA1-related cancer diagnoses – and two died in their mid-60s of these cancers – but they did not develop breast cancer.

    The following generation – my grandmother’s daughters (my aunts) – both developed breast cancer and they died earlier than the previous generation of BRCA1-affected women. My aunts died in their mid-30s and mid-40s respectively, so 20-30 years earlier than the previous generation’s BRCA-related deaths.

    I am the eldest of the generation after them and not long ago when I had my PBM at the age of 41 I breathed a huge sigh of relief when the subsequent pathology showed that I did not have breast cancer. But one of my cousins and my sister have already had breast cancer diagnoses (aged 38 and 27).

    It is important to ask why this is happening because it isn’t just happening to families with BRCA mutations. Environmental pollution is likely to be a factor, but I have gradually come to the conclusion that this may be a minor factor compared to the ‘big’ one: diet. The volume of dairy and meat (which contain both naturally-occurring hormones and high levels of fat) eaten by most people today from birth (and before, y their mothers when they’re in the womb) is the primary reason why we are seeing earlier breast cancer cases. Another factor is likely to be prolonged use of hormone-based contraception by some women.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s